Product
Help
Pricing
About
Jobs
Log in
Get started
Author
Add to collection
Sonam Mathur
Observed name:
Mathur, Sonam
OpenAlex ID:
A5089018074
The UK Competition Authority implements a revised approach for company director disqualification orders (OFT guidance document on director disqualification orders in competition cases)
2010
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
·
1
The Competition Commission of India conducts its first unannounced inspection in the premises of a UK-based Indian subsidiary (JCB India Private)
2014
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Competition Commission of India takes action against gun-jumping by airlines (Etihad / Jet Airways)
2013
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Indian Competition Authority takes action against gun-jumping by airlines (Etihad / Jet Airways)
2013
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Indian Competition Commission finds abuse of dominance by the cricket regulator (Board of Control for Cricket in India)
2013
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs proposes a significant change in respect of the search and seizure powers granted to the investigating office of Competition Commission
2012
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Indian Competition Commission issues its first decision ruling that the collective decision of banks and housing finance companies to levy prepayment charges did not constitute a cartel (Neeraj Malhotra/Deustche Post Bank Home Finance)
2010
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The UK Office of Fair Trading heavily fines price-fixing practices from supermarkets and tobacco firms in a decision which may be its largest ever combined fine (Imperial Tobacco, Gallaher and retailers)
2010
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The Competition Appeal Tribunal upholds the appeal against the Competition Commission break-up decision on airport services market (BAA Ltd)
2009
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
The UK Court of Appeal rules that damages cannot be recovered through the medium of Sec. 47A simply by identifying findings of fact by a regulator that could have amounted to a competition infringement, i.e., claimant's right of action exists only if the regulator has actually decided that such conduct would constitute an infringement of competition provision (EW&S Railways v. Enron)
2009
·
Sonam Mathur
·
e-Competitions Bulletin
Show more works
View as search
Works count:
11
Citation count:
1
H-index:
1
I10-index:
Year
Topic
Type
