Rural Labor Markets in an Era of Welfare Reform
Year: 2002
Type: book-chapter
Abstract: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) changed welfare as we knew it, dramatically altering the social safety net for poor Americans.PRWORA repealed the entitlement welfare program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, replacing it with a new federal block grant program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.The act also introduced program cuts and changes in the nation's food assistance programs.With these changes came new roles, responsibilities, and expectations for low-income families, their communities, and their local governments.With new opportunities come a great number of challenges to implementing welfare reform.Many issues resulting from welfare reform confront rural and urban areas alike.Meeting work requirements, achieving economic independence, and maintaining family and child well-being are concerns for both rural and urban people.Once employment is secured, ensuring the availability and affordability of child care, transportation, health care, housing, and other support services is needed.However, rural areas have unique demographic, economic, and geographic characteristics that may translate into unique challenges for welfare reform implementation.Compared with urban areas, many rural communities have higher poverty levels, greater unemployment, lower education levels, lower incomes, and longer distances between home, child care, and work sites.Because of lower population density, rural areas tend to have higher costs for services and frequently lack a full range of services.These characteristics all present a unique context in which to implement welfare reform.
Author: Robert M. Gibbs
Language: English
Subfield: Gender Studies
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Funders: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Northwestern University, Johns Hopkins University, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Food and Nutrition Service, Economic Research Service, National Safety Academic Fund
OpenAlex ID: W1487962410