Year: 1991
Type: article
Abstract: Part I analyzes several socioeconomic and legal changes that may have prompted the rise in employment discrimination litigation and estimates that these factors account for roughly two-thirds of the growth in litigation. Part II attempts to explain the residual growth. After discussing a number of commonly offered explanations, we put forth a somewhat counterintuitive theory of our own: As minorities and women moved into better jobs and the work place became more integrated, the likelihood of certain kinds of employment discrimination litigation increased. Part III analyzes the shifting composition of employment discrimination litigation-from discriminatory hiring to discriminatory discharge, and from class actions to individual suits. Finally, the conclusion discusses some policy implications of our findings.
Source: Stanford Law Review
DOI: 10.2307/1228893
Authors: John J. Donohue III, Peter Siegelman
Institutions: University of Connecticut, Yale University
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W1548977671