Year: 2011
Type: report
Abstract: This chapter analyzes the design of incentive schemes in education while reviewing empirical studies that evaluate performance pay programs for educators.Several themes emerge.First, it is difficult to use one assessment system to create both educator performance metrics and measures of student achievement.To mitigate incentives for coaching, incentive systems should employ assessments that vary in both format and item content.Separate no-stakes assessments provide more reliable information about student achievement because they create no incentives for educators to take hidden actions that contaminate student test scores.Second, relative performance schemes are rare in education even though they are more difficult to manipulate than systems built around psychometric or subjective performance standards.Third, assessment-based incentive schemes are mechanisms that complement rather than substitute for systems that promote parental choice, e.g.vouchers and charter schools.
DOI: 10.3386/w16710
Author: Derek Neal
Institutions: National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago
Language: English
Subfield: Education
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: green
Funder: University of Chicago
OpenAlex ID: W1598516172