Comparisons between explicit,implicit perceptual,and implicit conceptual memory tests : A selective review
Year: 1993
Type: article
Abstract: The standard data concerning comparisons between explicit, implicit perceptual, and implicit conceptual tests can be summarized in five conclusions: (1) conceptual manipulations affect explicit, and implicit conceptual, but not implicit perceptual tests; (2) perceptual manipulations, conversely, affect implicit perceptual, but not implicit conceptual and explicit tests; (3) generate is better for explicit and implicit conceptual tests, but read is better for implicit perceptual tests; (4) explicit and implicit condeptual tests can be dissociated; and (5) there is not priming on implicit perceptual tests without perceptual match.Two theoretical approaches can account for these standard results: the data-driven/conceptually-driven view, and the PRS view.Recently, counterexamples have been found for each of the five conclusions emanated from the standard data.These inconsistent findings are stimulating new empirical and theoretical developments in the field of priming research.
Authors: Roberto Cabeza, Nobuo Ohta
Language: English
Subfield: Cognitive Neuroscience
Field: Neuroscience
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W1697813439