Corrigendum to “Sensory—motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after stroke” [NeuroRehabilitation 9 (1997) 57–69]☆
Year: 1997
Type: erratum
Abstract: of studies on sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after unilateral brain damages Ipsilateral UE Author Variable/task Sample size/ Average time Control R/L differences sensory-motor examined lesion/side post-onset group used control Speed and accuracy Decreased Smutok 22 Single target tapping 32 RHBL, 19 LHBL -14 years Yes No difference Winstein 4 Single target tapping 10 RCVA,10 LCVA RCVA = 4.2 years Yes LCV A deficit but not RCV A LCV A = 3.3 years Robinson 24 Single target tapping 12 RCVA, 8 LCVA 29 months Yes LCV A deficit but not RCV A Carmon 5 (exp 1) Single target tapping 19 RHBL, 19 LHBL NR Yes No difference Carmon 5 (exp 2) Paced single target 20 RHBL, 20 LHBL NR Yes LHBL more affected in fast speed ~ tapping RHBL more affected in slow speed ~.
Source: Neurorehabilitation
Language: English
Subfield: Rehabilitation
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W1807851316