Audit Quality and Cost of Debt Capital for Private Firms: Evidence from Finland
Year: 2011
Type: article
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to examine the value relevance of the perceived audit quality in terms of who audits, as well as the audit outcomes in terms of the auditor’s opinion and accruals quality, in the pricing of debt capital for privately-held firms by examining a large sample of privately-held Finnish firms. The findings indicate that Big 4 audits and joint audits with more than one responsible auditor are associated with a decreased cost of debt capital. Also, firms with modified audit reports and those with lower-quality accruals have a higher cost of debt capital. The findings suggest that both the perceived audit quality and audit outcomes are relevant in the pricing of debt capital for privately-held firms. Additional analysis suggests that, while the outcomes of an audit are important in the pricing of debt regardless of a firm’s size, the perceived audit quality is more important for larger privately-held firms.
Author: Jukka Karjalainen
Institution: University of Eastern Finland
Language: English
Subfield: Accounting
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W1933743464