Year: 2014
Type: article
Abstract: Principal-agent theory has been the dominant theory at the heart of public sector accountability research.The notion of the potentially drifting agent-such as independent public agencies, opaque transnational institutions, or recalcitrant street-level bureaucrats-has been the guiding paradigm in empirical accountability research.The aim of this article is first of all to signal the limits of principal-agent theory as a predictive model of how accountability evolves.A string of findings in accountability research shows that we are in practice often not dealing with the envisaged problem of drifting agents (or actors in accountability terminology).Unexpectedly, we encounter recurring reports of drifting principals, or more accurately forums, which mysteriously choose not to hold their agents accountable.The article puts forward possible reasons for the observed discrepancies encountered in public accountability research, by identifying why such situations are at odds with the model's assumptions, as well as theoretical suggestions on fruitful ways to go forward.In the end, this study seeks to provide building blocks for theories of public sector accountability with an improved predictive capacity.This is done by connecting descriptive studies of the multifaceted character of accountability to "classical" principal-agent theory concerns about agency and control. IntroDuctIonOver the past decades, governments in most developed countries have actively strived, although for a variety of different and more positively framed reasons, to increase "agency loss" and to create accountability problems in the delivery of public policies.They have done so by systematically, although oftentimes not programmatically, shifting executive powers and responsibilities away from the congested political-administrative centers of the state toward a host of third parties: nonprofit organizations, privatized state enterprises, networks, trans-and international organizations and semiautonomous agencies.The trend was fuelled by, the now relinquishing, New Public Management-thinking and is currently, to some extent, refueled by the financial impediments of an age of austerity.The resulting
Authors: T. Schillemans, M. Busuioc
Language: English
Subfield: Public Administration
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W1965629333