Work

Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses

Year: 2013

Type: article

Abstract: This article introduces a special issue on the expanding research agenda on institutional fragmentation. The term refers to the growing diversity and challenges to coordination among private and public norms, treaties, and organizations that address a given issue area of international politics. International relations scholars increasingly address this phenomenon, framing it with alternative concepts like regime complexes or polycentricity. A considerable part of the existing debate remains focused on whether a centralized or polycentric governance architecture is preferable. Instead, as this special issue shows, domains of global environmental governance—like climate change, biological diversity, renewable energy, and forestry—are already fragmented. It is time to address new, more pertinent questions and help advance institutionalist research on this phenomenon. We introduce four major research themes for analyzing the fragmentation of different domains of global environmental governance: taking stock, causes, consequences, and responses.

Source: Global Environmental Politics

DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00180

Authors: Fariborz Zelli, Harro van Asselt

Institutions: Lund University, Stockholm Environment Institute, University of Oxford, Stockholm Environment Institute

Language: English

Topic: International Environmental Law and Policies

Subfield: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Field: Environmental Science

Domain: Physical Sciences

SDG: Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: bronze

OpenAlex ID: W1968971240