Work

Critiquing the peer review process: Examining a potential dual role conflict.

Year: 1992

Type: article

Study design: Observational Study

Source: American Psychologist

DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.12.1679

Authors: Daniel Houlihan, Lisa Hofschulte, Daniel Sachau, Christi Patten

Institution: Minnesota State University, Mankato

Language: English

Topic: Publishing and Scholarly Communication

Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science

Field: Arts and Humanities

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: closed

OpenAlex ID: W1970170016

FWCI: 5.659

Cites: 3

Cited by: 8

Related to: 10