Work

Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity

Year: 2013

Type: article

Study design: Clinical Trial

Source: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.016

Authors: Jakob B. Bjorner, Matthias Rose, Barbara Gandek, Arthur A. Stone, Doerte U. Junghaenel, John E. Ware

Institutions: University of Copenhagen, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Stiftung Charité, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Stony Brook University

Language: English

Topic: Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Subfield: Management Science and Operations Research

Field: Decision Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: green

Funders: Stanford University, Duke University, University of North Carolina, Northwestern University, University of Washington, University of Pittsburgh, Stony Brook University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Awards: UW Center on Outcomes Research in Rehabilitation(RMI), G1687612832, G2189855877, G4577066678, Validating and Extending the PROMIS Sexual Function Measure for Clinical Research, G5859104055, G6086277984, Ecological validity in patient-reported chronic disease outcomes(RMI), Improving Assessment of Physical Function and Drug Safety in Health and Disease, Validation and domain development in mental health and sleep-wake function, G7614056500, NIH PROMIS Statistical Coordinating Center(RMI), PROMIS Pediatrics: Longitudinal Validation and Linking Pediatric and Adult Item B, G8098421086

OpenAlex ID: W1982811083

FWCI: 16.45

Cites: 16

Cited by: 116

Related to: 10