Estimating Alarm Thresholds for Process Monitoring Data under Different Assumptions about the Data Generating Mechanism
Year: 2013
Type: article
Abstract: Process monitoring (PM) for nuclear safeguards sometimes requires estimation of thresholds corresponding to small false alarm rates. Threshold estimation dates to the 1920s with the Shewhart control chart; however, because possible new roles for PM are being evaluated in nuclear safeguards, it is timely to consider modern model selection options in the context of threshold estimation. One of the possible new PM roles involves PM residuals, where a residual is defined as residual = data − prediction. This paper reviews alarm threshold estimation, introduces model selection options, and considers a range of assumptions regarding the data-generating mechanism for PM residuals. Two PM examples from nuclear safeguards are included to motivate the need for alarm threshold estimation. The first example involves mixtures of probability distributions that arise in solution monitoring, which is a common type of PM. The second example involves periodic partial cleanout of in-process inventory, leading to challenging structure in the time series of PM residuals.
DOI: 10.1155/2013/705878
Authors: Tom Burr, Michael S. Hamada, John Howell, Misha Skurikhin, Larry Ticknor, Brian Weaver
Institutions: Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of Glasgow
Language: English
Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $1,630
OpenAlex ID: W1998491803
