Reply to “Likelihood of False-Positive Results in High-Impact Journals Publishing Groundbreaking Research”
Year: 2012
Type: letter
Abstract: We thank Drs. Agrawal and Sharma for their thoughtful letter, which suggests that papers in journals with high-impact factors are more likely to be retracted because they have a higher prior probability of being false as a consequence of their novelty. This is a good point, and we concur with the
Source: Infection and Immunity
DOI: 10.1128/iai.06330-11
Authors: Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall
Language: English
Subfield: Information Systems and Management
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W2002296559