Inconsistencies and inaccuracies in reporting on choice of endpoints and of statistical results in RCT of maternal diet
Year: 2015
Type: article
Abstract: Pediatric ObesityVolume 11, Issue 6 p. e16-e17 Letter to the Editor Inconsistencies and inaccuracies in reporting on choice of endpoints and of statistical results in RCT of maternal diet D. W. Lewis Jr, D. W. Lewis Jr Institute for Rural Health Research, College of Community Health Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL, USASearch for more papers by this authorD. A. Fields, D. A. Fields Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Norman, OK, USASearch for more papers by this authorD. B. Allison, D. B. Allison Office of Energetics and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USASearch for more papers by this author D. W. Lewis Jr, D. W. Lewis Jr Institute for Rural Health Research, College of Community Health Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL, USASearch for more papers by this authorD. A. Fields, D. A. Fields Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Norman, OK, USASearch for more papers by this authorD. B. Allison, D. B. Allison Office of Energetics and Nutrition Obesity Research Center, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 April 2015 https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12030Citations: 3 Names for PubMed indexing: Allison DB, Fields DA, Lewis DW Jr. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1Donnelly JM, Walsh JM, Byrne J, Molloy EJ, McAuliffe FM. Impact of maternal diet on neonatal anthropometry: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Obes 2015; 10: 52–56. 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00216.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Altman DG, Moher D. Declaration of transparency for each research article. BMJ 2013; 347: f4796. 10.1136/bmj.f4796 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Ross J. Trial registries, journals, and selective endpoint reporting: Still biased after all these years. JAMA Int Med Blog 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://internalmedicineblog.jamainternalmed.com/2014/04/21/trial-registries-journals-and-selective-endpoint-reporting-still-biased-after-all-these-years/ (accessed 29 January 2015). Google Scholar 4Young SS, Bang H, Oktay K. Cereal-induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive. Proc Biol Sci 2009; 276: 1211–1212. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1405 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869. 10.1136/bmj.c869 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Committee on Publication Ethics (2011). Cope code of conduct for journal editors. [WWW document]. URL http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf (accessed 29 January 2015). Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume11, Issue6December 2016Pages e16-e17 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Source: Pediatric Obesity
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12030
Authors: D. W. Lewis, D. A. Fields, D. B. Allison
Language: English
Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2021253573