Coming Up for Air: But Is It Oxygen or Phlogiston? A Response to Taber's Review of Constructivist Instruction: Success Or Failure?
Year: 2018
Type: article
Abstract: Keith Taber's lucid review (Taber, 2010) of the Tobias & Duffy (2009) book presents an articulate contrast to the typically contentious and unjoined debates about pro - and anti - constructivist approaches to education. Indeed the clarity of Taber‟s summary of those approaches highlights some specific issues about which I offer a few points of disagreement in what I hope is the same spirit of constructive (but not constructivist!) criticism.
Source: Figshare
DOI: 10.1184/r1/6614000
Author: Klahr, David
Institution: Carnegie Mellon University
Language: English
Subfield: Education
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W205350861