Year: 1982
Type: article
Abstract: Readers familiar with the contro- versy surrounding Dr. Inhaber's work' know that the mistake we mention was only one of dozens of substantial errors pervading every facet of his analysis.Inhaber's errors included major con- ceptual blunders, misreading or mis- quoting primary references, confusion of units, and arithmetic mistakes, as well as instances of every other pitfall mentioned in our article.These errors have been documented extensively else- where.2-9Correctingonly the largest and most obvious of these errors completely scrambled Inhaber's ranking of ener- gy sources.9
Author: Peter H. Gleick
Language: English
Field: Energy
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W2054092249