Mortality associated with use of weapons in armed conflicts, wartime atrocities, and civilian mass shootings: literature review
Year: 1999
Type: review
Abstract: Objective: To determine the implications of variation in mortality associated with use of weapons in different contexts. Design: Literature review. Settings: Armed conflicts and civilian mass shootings, 1929-96. Main outcome measure: Mortality from wounds. Results: During the fighting of war the number of people wounded is at least twice the number killed and may be 13 times as high; this ratio of the number wounded to the number killed results from the impact of a weapon system on human beings in the particular context of war. When firearms are used against people who are immobilised, in a confined space, or unable to defend themselves the wounded to killed ratio has been lower than 1 or even 0. Conclusions: Mortality from firearms depends not only on the technology of the weapon or its ammunition but also on the context in which it is used The increased mortality resulting from the use of firearms in situations other than war requires a complex interaction of factors explicable in terms of wound ballistics and the psychology of the user. Understanding these factors has implications for recognition of war crimes. In addition, the lethality of conventional weapons may be increased if combatants are disabled by the new non-lethal weapons beforehand; this possibility requires careful legal examination within the framework of the Geneva Conventions. Key messages Mortality from firearms varies according to the context in which they are used In war the number of people wounded is at least twice the number killed The number killed may be greater than the number wounded when firearms are used against people who are immobilised, in a confined space, or unable to defend themselves Recognising how the wounded to killed ratio varies has implications for recognising war crimes Combining use of weapons that are designed to incapacitate with use of conventional weapons requires examination under the law of war
Source: BMJ
Authors: R. M Coupland, D. R Meddings
Institution: International Committee of the Red Cross
Language: English
Subfield: Health
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W2070003336