Year: 2014
Type: erratum
Abstract: The original publication contained an error that does not impact the significant findings and does not invalidate any conclusions derived from the study. In the WM-REAS 2 group, we inadvertently included data from one subject whose performance in the Attention Network Test (ANT) during post-testing met the exclusionary criteria. This resulted in an exaggerated negative transfer effect for the WM-REAS 2 group. After excluding this subject, the ANT-visual attention data of the WM-REAS 2 group is comparable with the other training groups (Figure 1). The results are consistent after reanalysis, with no significant transfer effect in ANT-visual attention (F(3,154)=0.004, p=1.000, ηp2< .001). The reported association between sleep and ANT-visual attention in the original publication is no longer significant (r=.177, p=.310). The authors deeply regret this error.
Source: Frontiers in Psychology
Authors: Pauline L. Baniqued, Michael B. Kranz, Michelle W. Voss, Hyunkyu Lee, Joshua D. Cosman, Joan Severson, Arthur F. Kramer
Language: English
Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
OpenAlex ID: W2081622020