Year: 2013
Type: article
Abstract: A fundamental question in reading research concerns whether attention is allocated strictly serially, supporting lexical processing of one word at a time, or in parallel, supporting concurrent lexical processing of two or more words (Reichle, Liversedge, Pollatsek, & Rayner, 2009). The origins of this debate are reviewed. We then report three simulations to address this question using artificial reading agents (Liu & Reichle, 2010; Reichle & Laurent, 2006) that learn to dynamically allocate attention to 1-4 words to "read" as efficiently as possible. These simulation results indicate that the agents strongly preferred serial word processing, although they occasionally attended to more than one word concurrently. The reason for this preference is discussed, along with implications for the debate about how humans allocate attention during reading.
Source: Cognitive Science
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12027
Authors: Yanping Liu, Erik D. Reichle, Ding‐Guo Gao
Institutions: Sun Yat-sen University, University of Pittsburgh
Language: English
Subfield: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
Awards: G1084166965, G1209854279, G3341368201
OpenAlex ID: W2082788797
