An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentarites on 'Does Consent Bias Research?'
Year: 2013
Type: preprint
Abstract: The article is a response to the seven open peer commentaries submitted to our article Does Consent Bias Research? The response article discusses the following issues raised by the commentaries: (1) the definition of consent bias; (2) the magnitude of possible consent bias; (3) whether informed consent should be required for all information-based research; (4) alternative approaches to traditional informed consent; and (5) the value of big data.
Source: SSRN Electronic Journal
Authors: Mark A. Rothstein, Abigail B. Shoben
Institutions: University of Louisville, The Ohio State University
Language: English
Topic: Ethics in Clinical Research
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2084519246