Work

Science and Pseudo‐science: the Case of Creationism

Year: 1987
Type: article
Abstract: . The paper reviews criteria which have been used to distinguish science from nonscience and from pseudo–science, and it examines the extent to which they can usefully be applied to “creation science.” These criteria do not force a clear decision, especially as creation science resembles important eighteenth–century forms of orthodox science. Nevertheless, the proponents of creation science may be accused of pious fraud in failing to concede in their political battles that their “science” is tentative and tendentious and will continue to be so while it remains archaic and poorly integrated into the rest of science.
Source: Zygon®
Institution: University of Kent
Language: English
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,630
OpenAlex ID: W2084876844
FWCI: 2.703
Cites: 35
Cited by: 7
Related to: 10