Year: 2012
Type: article
Abstract: This study aimed to look at non-interference as a doctrine in China's Africa Policy.This involved looking at the non-interference principle in general, not only in Beijing's policies.The non-interference principle as contained in the policies of the African Union, United Nations and in the policies of Western and Asian states were discussed, noting a gradual shift away from strict non-interference towards non-indifference and humanitarian intervention.Beijing's orthodox understanding of non-interference, on the other hand, is based on respect for the sovereignty of other states and a belief that, unless requested, no state should interfere in the domestic affairs of another state.The doctrine of non-interference, as understood by Beijing was then applied to the crisis in Darfur.In the case of Darfur, Beijing initially adhered to its understanding of noninterference, in spite of criticism that its behaviour was based solely on China's own interests.China initially ignored international expectations to intervene in the affairs of Khartoum.In fact, Beijing continued to support Khartoum and abstained from UN Security Council resolutions on the matter.Initially the government in Beijing was not willing to make any adjustments to the non-interference doctrine, as the situation in Darfur did not seem to present any reason for Beijing to disregard its own policies.Yet Beijing gradually shifted in noninterference; seen in its pressure on Khartoum to allow the AU/UN hybrid peacekeeping force.The reasons for the shift are ascribed to various factors ranging from international pressure and even the possible reputational risk.China managed to balance its economic and political interests in Sudan with its duties and expectations of the Security Council.At the same time, Beijing continued to protect the sovereignty of the Khartoum government by adhering to its beliefs of the right of the state.The subtle shift away from Beijing's orthodox understanding of non-interference can be seen as China changing its non-interference doctrine to suit its new role in the international community.It can also be seen as China still adhering to the non-interference doctrine, as it places emphasis on avoiding sanctions and still requires permission from the host state for external intervention.Another key element is that it adapted when its interests were at risk.It would seem probable that this trend will continue, resulting rather in Beijing implementing a form of 'pro-active non-interference' based on the situation.Such a position would indicate a shift in the doctrine of non-interference based on the situation and pressure, but according to certain core values of Beijing.
Author: Annette Theron
Language: English
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2114330572