Work

Comparison of Simultaneous Prompting and No‐no Prompting in Two‐choice Discrimination Learning With Children With Autism

Year: 2010

Type: article

Abstract: This study compared no-no prompting procedures to simultaneous prompting procedures for 3 children with autism. Using a parallel treatments design, researchers taught rote math skills, receptive labels, or answers to "wh-" questions with both prompting systems. Results indicated that no-no prompting was effective in teaching all skills. By contrast, simultaneous prompting was effective in teaching only one pair of skills to 1 participant in the same amount of teaching time and trials. Researchers conducted a preference assessment to determine which of the two prompting procedures the 3 participants preferred. The participants showed mixed preferences for the two procedures.

Source: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-215

Authors: Justin B. Leaf, Jan B. Sheldon, James A. Sherman

Institution: University of Kansas

Language: English

Topic: Behavioral and Psychological Studies

Subfield: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Quality education

Open Access status: bronze

OpenAlex ID: W2131100322

FWCI: 8.594

Cites: 31

Cited by: 78

Related to: 10