Work

EU food legislation as perceived by industry

Year: 2007
Type: book
Abstract: Key findingsThe findings of this research are surprisingly positive for the system of EU food legislation in general.It is not considered to be a major factor hampering competitiveness.Nor is the EU system seen as inferior to the US system.Criticism focuses on details.Quite a few improvements could be made.Improvements would be welcomed in stability, clarity and accessibility of both legislation and authorities.The biggest burdens for SMEs are experienced in food hygiene and labelling legislation.Pre-market approval procedures are for the happy few.Due to the costs and time involved, it is very hard for a regular food business to bring a new additive, novel food, GMO or health claim to the market.For those who are in a position to follow such a procedure, it is not always clear precisely which procedure applies, what requirements must be met, how long the procedure will take and if a favourable outcome may be expected.A pro-active role of EU and national authorities in assisting companies to negotiate EU procedures and to comply with legal requirements would be most welcome.On the global market, EU authorities can increase their support for the European industry by engaging in export negotiations and by recognising scientific assessments performed under the jurisdiction of wellequipped foreign authorities.Very recently the European Commission undertook to reduce administrative costs by 25%.To achieve this ambition, audacious and radical steps are called for.Improvements are possible in the EU system of legislation as such and in EU food legislation in particular.
Language: English
Subfield: Food Science
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2146747766
FWCI:
Cites: 20
Cited by:
Related to: 10