Work

Replicability, Confidence, and Priors

Year: 2005

Type: article

Abstract: All commentaries concern priors. In this issue of Psychological Science, Cumming graphically demonstrates the implications of our ignorance of δ. Doros and Geier found mistakes in my argument and provide the Bayesian account. Macdonald notes that my program is like Fisher’s, Fisher’s is like the Bayesians’, and the Bayesians’ is incoherent. These Commentaries strengthen the foundation while leaving all conclusions intact.

Source: Psychological Science

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01653.x

Author: Peter R. Killeen

Institution: Arizona State University

Language: English

Topic: Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Subfield: Statistics and Probability

Field: Mathematics

Domain: Physical Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funders: National Science Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health

Awards: G1134280844, G3684447315, G8394658653