Work

The production of quick scoping reviews and rapid evidence assessments: a how to guide

Year: 2015

Type: report

Abstract: This document contains a brief overview of the different Evidence Reviews (ER) but is written primarily for those intending to commission and/or produce an ER in the form of Quick Scoping Reviews (QSR) or Rapid Evidence Assessments (REA), that lie between literature reviews and SRs in terms of rigour of assessment. These have been found to be well suited to meet the evidence challenges most frequently faced by the authors in meeting policy and practice evidence requirements.

Source: NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)

Authors: A. Frederick Collins, Deborah Coughlin, James Miller, Stuart A. Kirk

Language: English

Topic: Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Field: Decision Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funders: Harper Adams University, Natural England, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government, Bangor University, Natural Environment Research Council, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology

OpenAlex ID: W2200766922

Cites:

Cited by: 80

Related to: 10