Year: 2015
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: We examine some non-canonical annotation categories that license missing material (ellipses and enumerations).In extending these categories to learner data, the distinctions seem to require an annotator to determine whether a sentence is grammatical or not when deciding between particular analyses.We unpack the assumptions surrounding the annotation of learner language and how these particular phenomena compare to competing analyses, pointing out the implications for annotation practice and second language analysis.
Source: Linguistic Annotation Workshop
DOI: 10.3115/v1/w15-1619
Authors: Markus Dickinson, Marwa Ragheb
Institutions: Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana University
Language: English
Subfield: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W2251060459