Work

Instrumental conditioning of the galvanic skin response

Year: 1966
Type: dissertation
Abstract: Page 1. Schematic drawing of restraining device for GSR measurement suggested by Lykken and Rose (1959) 27 2. Photograph of the interior of the compartment with an animal in the restraining device 29 3. Photograph of the device used for visual stimulation without the framed section of milk-glass 30 4» Mean CRs as a function of Instrumental Contingencies 45 5. Mean CRs as a function of Experimental Phases 46 6. Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs as a function of Experimental Phases 47 7. Mean CRs for Instrumental Contingencies as a function of Experimental Phases 49 S. Mean CRs as a function of Days 50 9.Mean CRs for Instrumental Contingencies as a function of Days 51 10.Mean CRs for Experimental Phases as a function of Days 53 11.Mean CRs as a function of Trials 54 12. Mean CRs for Experimental Phases as a function of Trials 55 13.Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs as a function of Instrumental Contingencies 57 14.Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs of Positive and Negative Contingencies as a function of Experimental Phases 59 V vi Illustration Page 15.Mean CRs for Vis.:^^! (Positive) and Shock (Negative) ;):;s oV Constant a,,(i Pseudo Contingencies as ^ luncoior; of Experimental Phases 60 16.Sample records of one ::> showing GSRs to positive US on I'iiLh trial of third day for (1) classic'il conditioning, (2) )Ositive instrumental contingency, and 3) extinction 6I T: 17. Sample records of one S showing GSRs to positive U^ on ' ifth trial oT third day for (1) classical, cond itionirig, (2) negative instrumental contingency, and (3T extinction 62 IS.Sample records oi^ one C showing GSRs to negative US or.fifth trial of third day for (1) class i^cnl conditioning, (2) )Ositive ir.strv.-.i-^i.taicont L:;;i;ency , FH:^ 3) extirictio; 63 r: 19.Sample records of one S showing GSRs to negative US on fifth trial of third day for (1) classical conditioning, (2) negative instrumental contingency, and (3T extinction 64 20.Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs of Positive and Negative Contingencies as a function of Days and Experimental Phases 67 21.Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs of Constant and Pseudo Contingencies as a function of Days and Experimental Phases 66 22. Mean CRs for Visual (Positive) and Shock (Negative) USs of Positive and Negative Contingencies as a function of Days in Instrumental Contingencies Phase 70
Language: English
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2274008688
Cites: 17
Cited by:
Related to: 10