Year: 1992
Type: article
Abstract: History, or at least hindsight, has made possible analyses of some of the pitfalls of U.S. reportage on China from the 1930s to the U.S. recognition of the Beijing government. But without the anchor of “definite and decisive happenings about which there is no dispute” to “test the news,” it is hard to delve behind the unease many feel about contemporary coverage of China. Bias studies risk becoming public relations tools, just higher-order propaganda.
Author: Jude Carlson
Language: English
Subfield: Communication
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W2330347394
