Work

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige

Year: 2016

Type: article

Abstract: Most medical journals practice single-blind review 1 (authors' identities known to reviewers), but double-blind review (authors' identities masked to reviewers) may improve the quality of reviews. 2 Bias with single-blind review might be greatest in the setting of author or institutional prestige.

Source: JAMA

DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.11014

Authors: Kanu Okike, Kevin T. Hug, Mininder S. Kocher, Seth S. Leopold

Institutions: Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center, University of Washington, Boston Children's Hospital

Language: English

Topic: Publishing and Scholarly Communication

Subfield: Library and Information Sciences

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: bronze

OpenAlex ID: W2527516663

FWCI: 40.99

Cites: 7

Cited by: 197

Related to: 10