Year: 2016
Type: review
Study designs: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
Abstract: // Zhi-qiang Tian 1, 2, * , Xiao-fang Su 3, * , Zhi-yong Lin 4, * , Meng-chao Wu 1 , Li-xin Wei 1 , Jia He 4 1 Tumor Immunology and Gene Therapy Center, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China 2 Department of General Surgery, Wuxi People’s Hospital Affiliated Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214023, China 3 Department of Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy Medicine, Wuxi Taihu Hospital (101 Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army), Wuxi, Jiangsu 214044, China 4 Department of Health Statistics, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Li-xin Wei, email: [email protected] Jia He, email: [email protected] Keywords: colorectal liver metastases, laparoscopic liver resection, open liver resection, meta-analysis Received: August 08, 2016 Accepted: October 24, 2016 Published: November 02, 2016 ABSTRACT Background: To compare surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Results: A total of 14 retrospective studies with 1679 colorectal liver metastases patients were analyzed: 683 patients treated with laparoscopic liver resection and 996 patients with open liver resection. With respect to surgical outcomes, laparoscopic compared with open liver resection was associated with lower blood loss (MD, -216.7, 95% CI, -309.4 to -124.1; P < 0.00001), less requiring blood transfusion (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.55; P < 0.00001), lower postoperative complication morbidity (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P = 0.003), and shorter hospitalization time (MD, -3.85, 95% CI, -5.00 to -2.71; P < 0.00001). However, operation time and postoperative mortality were no significant difference between the two approaches. With respect to oncological outcomes, laparoscopic liver resection group was prone to lower recurrence rate (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61−0.99; P = 0.04), but surgical margins R0, overall survival and disease-free survival were no significant difference. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for all relevant studies. All statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. Dichotomous data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and continuous data were calculated by mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Conclusions: Laparoscopic and open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases have the same effect on oncological outcomes, but laparoscopic liver resection achieves better surgical outcomes.
Source: Oncotarget
Language: English
Subfield: Oncology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
Awards: G1005595324, 在肝癌发生过程中肿瘤坏死因子-α对肝前体细胞异常分化的影响及机制研究, 内毒素在结肠癌肝转移过程中对肝脏微环境和肿瘤细胞的双重作用研究, G1776938427, G1917738193, G3558571244, G4177810287, G4439505412, G4847806270, 缺氧肿瘤微环境在促进CD133+CXCR4-结肠癌细胞上皮间质转化中的作用及机制研究, G5574161494, G6055631930, G6294818867, G7017104764, 肝癌微环境参与经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗抵抗的机制研究, 肿瘤微环境中间充质干细胞增强肝癌干细胞干性维持的机制研究, G9457930
OpenAlex ID: W2546516223
