Assessing Program Outcomes: Rationale and Benefits of Posttest-then-Retrospective-Pretest Designs
Year: 2007
Type: article
Abstract: The importance of program evaluation for decision making, accountability, and sustainability is examined in this article. Pros and cons of traditional pretest-posttest and posttest-then-retrospective-pretest methodologies are discussed. A case study of Utah’s 4-H mentoring program using a posttest-then-retrospective-pretest design is presented. Furthermore, it is argued that the posttest-then-retrospective-pretest design is a valid, efficient, and cost-effective way to assess program outcomes and impacts.
Source: Journal of Youth Development
DOI: 10.5195/jyd.2007.366
Institutions: University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, Utah State University
Language: English
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W2558798149
