Work

Response to “Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment?”

Year: 2017

Type: article

Abstract: We are heartened by Tom Tyler's concurrence with the key conclusion of our full essay that evidence of procedurally just treatment of citizens by police or other representatives of the criminal justice system altering citizen perceptions of legitimacy and legal compliance is in short supply. Our main point of disagreement with Tyler is on how this agreed-upon conclusion about the state of the evidence should be communicated to policy makers. It is our view that the policy process is best served by a forthright acknowledgement of the weaknesses of the evidence base.

Source: Annual Review of Law and Social Science

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120516-024409

Authors: Daniel S. Nagin, Cody W. Telep

Institutions: Carnegie Mellon University, Arizona State University

Language: English

Topic: Policing Practices and Perceptions

Subfield: Political Science and International Relations

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: hybrid

OpenAlex ID: W2579947985

FWCI: 13.23

Cites: 8

Cited by: 17

Related to: 10