Year: 2007
Type: article
Abstract: The practice of labeling seems to allow children to make difficult relational similarity matches.Two experiments explore the cognitive processes of comparison and replacement that have been implicated in the beneficial effects of linguistic labeling.Since linguistic labels may be implicated in a number of these processes, our experiments used traditional non-linguistic labels (post-its) to promote either the process of comparison or replacement.Results from two relational matching tasks suggest that comparison is more influential than replacement.
Authors: Ji Y. Son, Linda B. Smith, Robert L. Goldstone
Institution: Indiana University
Language: English
Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
Funder: National Institutes of Health
OpenAlex ID: W2587299499