Work

Communicating geomorphology: an empirical evaluation of the discipline's impact and visibility

Year: 2017

Type: article

Abstract: Concern among geomorphologists that the discipline's visibility and impact are becoming suppressed are reflected in a series of recent Earth Surface Exchanges (ESEX) commentaries by Tooth et al. This paper from the British Society for Geomorphology (BSG) Communicating Geomorphology Fixed‐Term Working Group (FTWG) reports initial findings from an online survey of BSG members alongside an empirical assessment of the term's prominence in academic output: international peer‐reviewed journals, undergraduate Geoscience degrees in world‐leading institutions and the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) impact statements. Our observations indicate the scientific standing of the discipline has been retained but the term itself is less widely utilised and we offer a series of suggestions actionable by the geomorphology community. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Source: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

DOI: 10.1002/esp.4129

Authors: Lucy Clarke, Daniel Schillereff, Emma Shuttleworth

Institutions: University of Gloucestershire, King's College London, University of Manchester

Language: English

Topic: scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Field: Decision Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funders: University of Gloucestershire, British Society for Geomorphology

OpenAlex ID: W2598516429