Oral anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device implantation
Year: 2017
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is associated with increased periprocedural risks after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Patterns of anticoagulation management involving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have not been characterized. HYPOTHESIS: Anticoagulation strategies and outcomes differ by anticoagulant type in patients undergoing CIED implantation. METHODS: Using the nationwide Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation, we assessed how atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing CIED implantation were cared for and their subsequent outcomes. Outcomes were compared by oral anticoagulant therapy (none, warfarin, or NOAC) as well as by anticoagulation interruption status. RESULTS: Among 9129 AF patients, 416 (5%) underwent CIED implantation during a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range, 24-36). Of these, 60 (14%) had implantation on a NOAC. Relative to warfarin therapy, those on a NOAC were younger (70.5 years [range, 65-77.5 years] vs 77 years [range, 70-82 years]), had less valvular heart disease (15.0% vs 31.3%), higher creatinine clearance (67.3 [range, 59.7-99.0] vs 65.8 [range, 50.0-91.6]), were more likely to have persistent AF (26.7% vs 22.9%), and use concomitant aspirin (51.7% vs 35.2%). OAC therapy was commonly interrupted for CIED in 64% (n = 183 of 284) of warfarin patients and 65% (n = 39 of 60) of NOAC patients. Many interrupted patients received intravenous bridging anticoagulation: 33/183 (18%) interrupted warfarin and 4/39 (10%) interrupted NOAC patients. Thirty-day periprocedure bleeding and stroke adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Management of anticoagulation among AF patients undergoing CIED implantation is highly variable, with OAC being interrupted in more than half of both warfarin- and NOAC-treated patients. Bleeding and stroke events were infrequent in both warfarin and NOAC-treated patients.
Source: Clinical Cardiology
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22726
Authors: Eric Black‐Maier, Sunghee Kim, Benjamin A. Steinberg, Gregg C. Fonarow, James V. Freeman, Peter R. Kowey, Jack Ansell, Bernard J. Gersh, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Gerald Naccarelli, Elaine M. Hylek, Alan S. Go, Eric D. Peterson, Jonathan P. Piccini, for the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT‐AF) Investigators
Institutions: Duke Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, University of California, Los Angeles, Yale University, Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Heart Institute, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York University, Mayo Clinic, Stanford Medicine, Stanford University, Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Boston University, Kaiser Permanente
Language: English
Subfield: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,810
OpenAlex ID: W2614423009
