Work

An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering

Year: 2017

Type: conference-paper

Abstract: In this paper we answer empirically the following research question: " Are dialectical explanation methods more effective than one-shot explanation methods for Intersection of Closed Repairs inconsistency tolerant semantics in existential rules knowledge bases? " We ran two experiments with 84 and respectively 38 participants and showed that under certain conditions dialectical approaches are significantly more effective than one-shot explanations.

Source: HAL

Authors: Abdelraouf Hecham, Abdallah Arioua, Gem Stapleton, Madalina Croitoru

Language: English

Topic: Semantic Web and Ontologies

Subfield: Artificial Intelligence

Field: Computer Science

Domain: Physical Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funder: Agence Nationale de la Recherche

Awards: ASP technologIes for Querying large scale multisource heterogeneous web information, G6702880738

OpenAlex ID: W2740989556

FWCI: 0.991

Cites: 18

Cited by: 12

Related to: 10