Work

It Is Time to Re‐Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research

Year: 2017

Type: article

Abstract: Problems in peer review, the backbone of maintaining high standards in scientific publishing, have led to wide spread discontent within the scientific community. Training in the peer review process and a simpler format to assist in decision making are possible courses to improve and expedite the process of peer review and scientific publishing.

Source: BioEssays

DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700185

Authors: Rajat Bhattacharya, Lee M. Ellis

Institution: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Language: English

Topic: Publishing and Scholarly Communication

Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science

Field: Arts and Humanities

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funders: Gillson Longenbaugh Foundation, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute

Awards: Paracrine Role of Endothelial Cells on the Colorectal Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype, G6736661663, Cancer Center Support Grant