Year: 2018
Type: article
Abstract: A. Hypothesis and methodEffectiveness is now widely embraced as a measure of legislative quality by international and national lawmakers, and academic and professional drafters.2 However, it continues to remain abstract as a form of wish or intent, rather than a concrete, applied concept.When it comes to legislative scrutiny, effectiveness remains in the aether but its concrete application to legislative scrutiny (which, after all, is a mechanism set to measure the possible or post facto success of legislation) remains untold.The aim of this paper is to find and express the concrete mechanism of application of the concept of legislative effectiveness to pre-and post-legislative scrutiny.Legislative scrutiny here is used as a generic term, encompassing Thornton's internal and external verification as the fifth stage of legislative drafting, evaluation ex ante via impact assessment or cost benefit analysis, and post legislative ad hoc or regular monitoring scrutiny exercises linked to sunset clauses or not.The hypothesis of this paper is that the effective legislative scrutiny requires holistic and individualised analysis of the particular legislative text that cannot be restricted into formalistic, pre-prepared, universally applied criteria expressed in multiple-choice or box-ticking styled model forms.In this sense, the paper departs from the trend of model forms (be it Impact Assessments forms, cost benefit analysis forms, or legislative effectiveness forms).The paper proposes that, not in their stead but perhaps in an overview of the existing scrutiny mechanisms, 1 Helen Xanthaki, LLB (Ath), MJur, PhD (Dunelm), SFHEA, is Professor of Law, UCL; Director of PGLaws Programmes, University of London;
DOI: 10.1017/err.2018.25
Author: Helen XANTHAKI
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2883874636