Work

Re: The art of cardiovascular risk assessment. Clinical Cardiology 2018;41(5):677–684.

Year: 2018

Type: letter

Abstract: The authors would like to correct two sentences in section 4.2. They should read: Among those deemed reasonable to treat based on ASCVD guidelines (10-year risk, 5%–20%), 50% had a CAC score of 0. Furthermore, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) recommends consideration of a CAC score in those with a risk score of 5% to 20% and selectively in those with lower predicted risk who have a family history of premature ASCVD or other risk conditions.

Source: Clinical Cardiology

DOI: 10.1002/clc.22998

Authors: Jay Khambhati, Marc Allard‐Ratick, Devinder Dhindsa, Suegene Lee, John Chen, Pratik B. Sandesara, Wesley O'Neal, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Nathan D. Wong, Roger S. Blumenthal, Laurence S. Sperling

Language: English

Topic: Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Subfield: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: bronze

OpenAlex ID: W2888746110

Cites:

Cited by: 1

Related to: 10