Year: 2008
Type: article
Abstract: This short review of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1886) shows how Robert Louis Stevenson's novella may be used as a text in a criminal law class. Jekyll's written confession is ambiguous about his responsibility for the murder he has committed. He seems to deny that he was morally sane at the time of the murder, yet he also makes a point of declaring that he had voluntarily stripped [him]self of all those balancing instincts that would have allowed himself to control himself, and he compares himself to drunkard. Jekyll further complicates the issue by tracing his violent impulses back to the thorough and primitive duality of humans in general. Around the time the novella was published, English courts were starting to ask whether mental conditions resulting from voluntary intoxication may negate specific intent. Students may be provoked to think more deeply about criminal responsibility by reading Jekyll and Hyde in relation to those judgments, and in relation to more recent judgments in which a party's voluntary act triggered the manifestation of a preexisting illness.
Source: TSpace (University of Toronto)
Author: Simon Stern
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2913181492