Work

Methods of estimating the pooled effect size under meta-analysis: A comparative appraisal

Year: 2019

Type: article

Abstract: Introduction Present study has compared methods of synthesizing the pooled effect estimate under meta-analysis, namely Fixed Effect Method (FEM), Random Effects Method (REM) and a recently proposed Weighted Least Square (WLS) method. Methods Three methods of estimating pooled effect estimates under meta-analysis were compared on the basis of coverage probability and width of confidence interval. These methods were compared for seven outcomes with varying heterogeneity and sample size using real data of systematic review comparing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy involving ‘hazard ratio' and ‘risk ratio' as effect size. Results WLS method was found to be superior to FEM having higher coverage probability in case of heterogeneity. Further, WLS with similar coverage probability was found to be superior to REM with more precise confidence interval. Conclusion Unrestricted WLS method needs to be preferred unconditionally over fixed effect method and random effects method.

Source: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2019.05.004

Authors: Mona Pathak, Sada Nand Dwivedi, Bhaskar Thakur, Sreenivas Vishnubhatla

Institution: All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Language: English

Topic: Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Field: Decision Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $3,000