Work

MROM-p: An Interactive Activation, Multiple Readout Model of Orthographic and Phonological Processes in Visual Word Recognition

Year: 1998
Type: book-chapter
Abstract: In contrast, in the LDT, feedforward inconsistency effects are much less clear. To the extent that the LDT does not require an overt pronunciation, it is also less likely to be sensitive to feedforward consistency (Jared et al., 1990). Two studies (Brown, 1987; Jared et al., 1990) that used more carefully controlled stimuli than did older studies failed to find an effect. In contrast, Stone et al. (997) provided one of the first experimental demonstrations of a feedforward consistency effect in the LDT using English-speaking participants (see Pugh, Rexer, & Katz, 1994, for an earlier demonstration). Stone et al. (997) found that mean LDT latency to feedforward inconsistent words was 48 milliseconds longer than for feedforward consistent words when all words were feedback consistent. For words that were feedback inconsistent (i.e ., whose phonological body maps onto more than one spelling, such as / -ip/ in DEEP and HEAP), the effect decreased to 8 milliseconds. This finding suggests that previous studies might have failed to detect the effect because they did not control for feedback consistency. Ziegler et al. (in press-a) replicated this effect in French. They obtained effects similar to Stone et al.: A 53-millisecond feedforward consistency effect when words were feedback consistent decreased to 12 milliseconds when feedback inconsistent words were used. To the extent that this effect can be successfully replicated and because the LDT requires no overt pronunciation, the feedforward consistency effect in the LDT provides stronger evidence for bidirectional influences of orthographic-phonological processes in visual word recognition than do the results from the naming task reported earlier.
Source: HAL
Language: English
Field: Psychology
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2962752854
FWCI: 11.83
Cites:
Cited by: 116
Related to: 10