Work

Do new forms of scholarly communication provide a pathway to open science

Year: 2015
Type: dissertation
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: This thesis explores new forms of scholarly communication and the practice of open science among UK based academics.Open science broadly refers to practices that allow cost-free open access to academic research.Three aspects of open science are examined in this study: open access to research articles; open access to research data; and publishing ongoing research updates using social media.The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a series of scoping studies using qualitative methods followed up by an Internet survey of 1,829 UK academics.Overall this thesis has shown that whilst there is support for open science, the use of open science by academics was limited.Many academics were not aware of RCUK's open access policy and had limited experience of making their research articles freely accessible online.Most academics did not share their primary research data online.Although some academics had used a range of social media tools to communicate their research, the majority had not used social media in their research work.Overall, male, older and senior academics were more likely to use open access publishing and share primary research data, but were less likely to use social media for research.Academics based in Medical and Natural Sciences were more likely to use open access publishing and share research data, but less likely to use social media for their research compared to academics from Humanities and Social Sciences.Academics who were aware of RCUK's open access policy and who recognised the citation advantages of open access were more likely to publish in open access journals.Academics that were aware of RCUK's open access policy and had used social media for research were more likely to self-archive research articles.Academics that had used secondary data collected by others and selfarchived research papers were more likely to share their own primary research data.Academics seemed to be strongly influenced by their colleagues' recommendation for the adoption of social media in research.Those who considered that the general public should know about their research findings were more likely to share their research on social media.A group of academics were identified and described as super users who frequently communicated ongoing research on social media.These super users were more likely to use tablet computers and have received social media training organised by their institutions.
Author: Yimei Zhu
Language: English
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W2969917323
Cites: 220
Cited by: 1
Related to: 10