Work

Power, Powerlessness, and Journal Ranking Lists: The Marginalization of Fields of Practice

Year: 2020

Type: article

Abstract: This essay contributes a new perspective to debates about journal ranking lists and their effects on the practice of scholarship. Our argument is grounded in practice theory and draws on Bourdieu’s concept of field. We examine the effect of metrics, targets, and rankings on human resource development, a conjunctive field associated with the management learning and education (MLE) field. We examine the ways in which boundaries of the MLE field are shaped by journal ranking lists and how, irrespective of seniority in the field, scholars simultaneously experience both power and powerlessness as a result of journal ranking processes. We contribute a new perspective on issues of academic practice with consequences for specialized areas of scholarship. We conclude by proposing practical interventions that senior scholars and journal editors can undertake to challenge the undesirable effects of ranking systems and encourage scholarly diversity.

Source: Academy of Management Learning and Education

DOI: 10.5465/amle.2019.0037

Authors: Valerie Anderson, Carole Elliott, Jamie L. Callahan

Institutions: University of Portsmouth, University of Roehampton, University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle University

Language: English

Topic: Publishing and Scholarly Communication

Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science

Field: Arts and Humanities

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: green

Funders: Nottingham Trent University, Trent University, Research England

OpenAlex ID: W2998505118

FWCI: 30.75

Cites: 74

Cited by: 59

Related to: 10