Work

When Science Confronts Philosophy: Three Case Studies

Year: 2020
Type: article
Abstract: This paper examines three cases of the clash between science and philosophy: Zeno’s paradoxes, the Frame Problem, and a recent attempt to experimentally refute skepticism. In all three cases, the relevant science claims to have resolved the purported problem. The sciences, construing the term broadly, are mathematics, artificial intelligence, and psychology. The goal of this paper is to show that none of the three scientific solutions work. The three philosophical problems remain as vibrant as ever in the face of robust scientific attempts to dispel them. The paper concludes by examining some consequences of this persistence.
Source: Axiomathes
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,750
OpenAlex ID: W2998759609
FWCI: 5.731
Cites: 27
Cited by: 5
Related to: 10