Primary non‐adherence and the new‐user design
Year: 2018
Type: article
Abstract: The new‐user design has been widely used in pharmacoepidemiology. By following patients from the initiation of a treatment, the new‐user design has several advantages over designs that begin follow‐up on prevalent users. The new‐user design allows study of the full time course of outcome risk after treatment initiation, with representation of early and late events. It also ensures appropriate temporal ordering of baseline confounders, exposures, and outcomes, avoiding adjustment for intermediate variables that may have been affected by treatment. Coupled with an active‐comparator design, new‐user approaches can mitigate the potential for immortal time‐bias and confounding by indication. The active comparator new‐user design helps to articulate clearly a causal question about the benefits and harms of starting a particular intervention in a more real‐world setting. These theoretical and conceptual advantages have led to the recommendation that such designs should be a default approach for comparative effectiveness research studies.
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4403
Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Language: English
Subfield: Family Practice
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
Awards: Structural models for treatment and exposure effects in clinical HIV cohorts, G234276190, G2343608682, From patients to policy: innovative epidemiology for implementation science, Renal Epidemiology Training Grant, Patterns of use, comparative effectiveness, and safety of rotavirus vaccines, G418714284, A retrospective cohort study of the safety of testosterone therapy in older men, Propensity Scores and Preventive Drug Use in the Elderly, G9000100083
OpenAlex ID: W3004528805
