We Need a Taxonomy of State-Level Opioid Policies
Year: 2020
Type: article
Abstract: The opioid crisis is an unprecedented national emergency.Societal costs from misuse of, addiction to, and overdose from prescription opioids, heroin, and synthetic opioids over the last 2 decades account for hundreds of thousands of deaths and billions of dollars in economic burden. 1 States have responded with wide-ranging policies that vary substantially in their key components and the opioid-crisis aspects targeted.Even nominally identical policies, such as prescription drug monitoring programs, differ in design details across states and over time.These details matter for explaining differential results on key outcomes. 2Consequently, it is critical to identify the most effective policy components and how best to implement them.The lack of a standardized nomenclature to classify state-level opioid policies is a substantial barrier to understanding their effectiveness.For example, a recent study found that state laws allowing pharmacist-direct dispensing of naloxone were associated with significant reductions in fatal overdoses, but no such association was observed for other pharmacy naloxone access laws. 3The bespoke categorization of naloxone access laws as either providing pharmacists direct or indirect authority to dispense naloxone was subsequently challenged as an oversimplification, given that heterogeneity in
Source: JAMA Health Forum
Authors: Sean Grant, Rosanna Smart, Bradley D. Stein
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $5,000
Funder: National Institute on Drug Abuse
OpenAlex ID: W3005498527
