Year: 2020
Type: article
Abstract: The Gricean paradigm in pragmatics has recently been attacked for its alleged lack of explanatory import, based on the claim that it does not seek accounts of how utterance interpretation actually works, but merely of how it might work. This article rebuts this line of attack by offering a clear and detailed account of the explanatory project of Gricean pragmatics according to which the latter aims for rationalizing explanations of utterance interpretation. It is shown that, on this view, Gricean pragmatics seeks psychological explanations of utterance interpretation that are “cognitively real” in a perfectly clear and robust sense.
Source: Mind & Language
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12295
Author: Lars Dänzer
Institution: University of Duisburg-Essen
Language: English
Subfield: Language and Linguistics
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,200
Funder: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Award: G2327285989
OpenAlex ID: W3022303992
