Year: 2018
Type: article
Abstract: Based on a sample of seven languages, I show that the so-called modal inferencesin ever free relatives (ignorance and indifference) are not universally available. The primaryreading of ever free relatives crosslinguistically turns out to be a “non-modal” one, which isavailable to all languages under investigation. The implication is that if there is a modal inferencetriggered by the use of the ever-morpheme in FRs, the inference is likely to have a sourceexternal to the ever free relative (Lauer, 2009; Condoravdi, 2015; Hirsch, 2016). In line withthis conclusion, I propose to generalize Hirsch’s (2016) analysis of ignorance ever free relatives,suggesting that all ever free relatives, no matter how they are ultimately interpreted, areinstances of (un)conditionals + donkey-anaphoric definite descriptions.Keywords: ever free relatives, (un)conditionals, definite descriptions,modal inferences, crosslinguisticsemantics
Source: ZAS Papers in Linguistics
Author: Radek Šimík
Institution: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Language: English
Subfield: Language and Linguistics
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W3088211525